什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i5-12400F 或 AMD Ryzen 5 5600X? 哪种处理器更快？
我们准备了一份比较，帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
Intel Core i5-12400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X has a base frequency of 3.7 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 2020-11-05.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
共同立场 Intel Core i5-12400F 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
更高的时钟速度
左右 48% 更好的时钟速度
2.50 GHz
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 5 % higher specified turbo frequency
4.40 GHz
共同立场 AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i5-12400F
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
AMD Ryzen 5000
Ryzen
4
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Desktop
Desktops / Boxed Processor
Ryzen 5000 Series
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
-
3.7 GHz
normal
6
12
是
是
4.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
None
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 和 Intel Core i5-12400F. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
是
128 GB
2
DDR4
PCIe 4.0
20
4.0
3200
是
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-12400F 和 AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
95 °C
65 W
-
65 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-12400F 和 AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Vermeer (Zen 3)
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
3 MB
32 MB
100-000000065
2020-11-05
AM4
TSMC 7nm FinFET
AMD-V, SVM
Vermeer
Shared tests with results for both models: 13
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12400F | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 167.733383 samples/min Submissions: 9 | 153.776514 samples/min Submissions: 28 | -8.3 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 169.74955 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 155.358716 samples/min Submissions: 20 | -8.5 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 154.23191 samples/min Submissions: 94 | 144.979041 samples/min Submissions: 165 | -6.0 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 188.63931 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 169.530851 samples/min Submissions: 33 | -10.1 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 146.386328 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 143.389987 samples/min Submissions: 120 | -2.0 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 198.128399 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 177.703614 samples/min Submissions: 41 | -10.3 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 145.751849 samples/min Submissions: 65 | 136.96555 samples/min Submissions: 172 | -6.0 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 197.967794 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 181.891479 samples/min Submissions: 47 | -8.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 148.953521 samples/min Submissions: 121 | 141.787816 samples/min Submissions: 198 | -4.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 199.716739 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 182.262754 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -8.7 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 158.67054 samples/min Submissions: 58 | 150.117268 samples/min Submissions: 106 | -5.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 197.430931 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 178.569622 samples/min Submissions: 38 | -9.6 % |
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-12400F | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 157.851555 samples/min Submissions: 96 | 147.415889 samples/min Submissions: 280 | -6.6 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i5-12400F 和 AMD Ryzen 5 5600X.
比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
