Qual è la scelta migliore AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT o AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE? Quale scheda grafica è più veloce?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has a base frequency of 2.15 GHz. Dimensione della memoria 12 GB. Tipo di memoria GDDR6. Rilasciato in 2022-05-10.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE Dimensione della memoria 16 GB. Tipo di memoria GDDR6. Rilasciato in 2023-07-27.
Motivi da considerare Posizione nella classifica generale
(sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)
Posizioni comuni AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT GPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
Motivi da considerare Più memoria
33% più memoria
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Confronto dei dati tecnici di base delle schede grafiche AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT e AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE, chip, unità di elaborazione delle informazioni.
Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.
Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.
Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.
Tipi e dimensioni dei dissipatori per il sistema di raffreddamento delle schede grafiche AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT e AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE.
Connettività e collegamenti.
Dati tecnici utilizzati al massimo delle loro potenzialità nei giochi per computer.
Supporto incorporato per gli standard di compressione video e immagine.
La differenza di dimensioni, peso e slot dei dispositivi a confronto
Confronto tra le interfacce e le date di rilascio per le GPU AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE e AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT.
Shared tests with results for both models: 11
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT | AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / HIP / Windows | 1773.294966 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 3362.628167 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +89.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / HIP / Windows | 1543.348166 samples/min Submissions: 22 | 2904.040829 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +88.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / HIP / Linux | 1537.197129 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 2522.33331 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +64.1 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / HIP / Windows | 1544.842826 samples/min Submissions: 30 | 2755.073764 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +78.3 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / HIP / Linux | 1709.784049 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 2850.718761 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +66.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / HIP / Windows | 1651.191972 samples/min Submissions: 43 | 2779.253387 samples/min Submissions: 36 | +68.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / HIP / Linux | 1725.322462 samples/min Submissions: 28 | 2892.788612 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +67.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / HIP / Windows | 1662.164399 samples/min Submissions: 39 | 2811.331019 samples/min Submissions: 36 | +69.1 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / HIP / Linux | 1693.192703 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 2638.239746 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +55.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / HIP / Windows | 1685.260323 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 2795.052261 samples/min Submissions: 22 | +65.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / HIP / Windows | 1606.147107 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 2609.153346 samples/min Submissions: 16 | +62.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.