Quel est le meilleur choix ? AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ou AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE? Quelle carte graphique est la plus rapide ?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has a base frequency of 2.15 GHz. Taille de la mémoire 12 GB. Type de mémoire GDDR6. Sorti en 2022-05-10.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE Taille de la mémoire 16 GB. Type de mémoire GDDR6. Sorti en 2023-07-27.
Raisons de considérer Place dans le classement général
(sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)
Positions communes AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT GPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Raisons de considérer Plus de mémoire
33% de mémoire supplémentaire
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Comparaison des données techniques de base des cartes graphiques AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT et AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE, puce, unités de traitement de l'information.
Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.
Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.
Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.
Types et tailles de refroidisseurs pour le système de refroidissement des cartes graphiques AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT et AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE.
Connectivité et connexions.
Des données techniques utilisées à leur plein potentiel dans les jeux informatiques.
Prise en charge intégrée des normes de compression vidéo et image.
La différence de taille, de poids et de fente des appareils comparés
Comparaison des interfaces et des dates de sortie des GPU AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE et AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT.
Shared tests with results for both models: 11
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT | AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / HIP / Windows | 1773.294966 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 3362.628167 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +89.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / HIP / Windows | 1543.348166 samples/min Submissions: 22 | 2904.040829 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +88.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / HIP / Linux | 1537.197129 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 2522.33331 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +64.1 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / HIP / Windows | 1544.842826 samples/min Submissions: 30 | 2755.073764 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +78.3 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / HIP / Linux | 1709.784049 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 2850.718761 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +66.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / HIP / Windows | 1651.191972 samples/min Submissions: 43 | 2779.253387 samples/min Submissions: 36 | +68.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / HIP / Linux | 1725.322462 samples/min Submissions: 28 | 2892.788612 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +67.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / HIP / Windows | 1662.164399 samples/min Submissions: 39 | 2811.331019 samples/min Submissions: 36 | +69.1 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / HIP / Linux | 1693.192703 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 2638.239746 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +55.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / HIP / Windows | 1685.260323 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 2795.052261 samples/min Submissions: 22 | +65.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / HIP / Windows | 1606.147107 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 2609.153346 samples/min Submissions: 16 | +62.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.