최선의 선택은 무엇인가요? AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 또는 AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE? 어떤 그래픽 카드가 더 빠르나요?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has a base frequency of 2.15 GHz. 메모리 크기 12 GB. 메모리 유형 GDDR6. 에 출시 2022-05-10.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 메모리 크기 16 GB. 메모리 유형 GDDR6. 에 출시 2023-07-27.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
장소
공통 위치 AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 GPU.
고려해야 하는 이유 더 많은 메모리
33메모리 % 증가
12 GB
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
그래픽 카드의 기본 기술 데이터 비교 AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 그리고 AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE, 칩, 정보 처리 장치.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
80
80
-
80
-
5120
-
160
RDNA 3
Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.
64 MB
576 GB/s
256 bit
-
18 Gbps
16 GB
GDDR6
Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.
-
2245 MHz
1880 MHz
-
Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.
-
-
260 W
-
260 W
그래픽 카드 냉각 시스템용 쿨러의 종류와 크기 AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 그리고 AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE.
-
-
-
-
-
-
연결 및 연결.
-
-
-
-
2.1
-
-
2x8-Pin
-
-
2.1
컴퓨터 게임에서 최대한 활용되는 기술 데이터.
-
-
-
-
-
비디오 및 이미지 압축 표준 기본 지원.
Decode / Encode
-
-
-
-
비교 장치의 크기, 무게 및 슬롯 차이
-
-
-
-
-
GPU의 인터페이스 및 출시일 비교 AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 그리고 AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT.
-
-
-
-
2023-07-27
46 TFLOPS
Shared tests with results for both models: 11
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT | AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / HIP / Windows | 1773.294966 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 3362.628167 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +89.6 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / HIP / Windows | 1543.348166 samples/min Submissions: 22 | 2904.040829 samples/min Submissions: 41 | +88.2 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / HIP / Linux | 1537.197129 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 2522.33331 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +64.1 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / HIP / Windows | 1544.842826 samples/min Submissions: 30 | 2755.073764 samples/min Submissions: 23 | +78.3 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / HIP / Linux | 1709.784049 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 2850.718761 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +66.7 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / HIP / Windows | 1651.191972 samples/min Submissions: 43 | 2779.253387 samples/min Submissions: 36 | +68.3 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / HIP / Linux | 1725.322462 samples/min Submissions: 28 | 2892.788612 samples/min Submissions: 13 | +67.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / HIP / Windows | 1662.164399 samples/min Submissions: 39 | 2811.331019 samples/min Submissions: 36 | +69.1 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / HIP / Linux | 1693.192703 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 2638.239746 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +55.8 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / HIP / Windows | 1685.260323 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 2795.052261 samples/min Submissions: 22 | +65.9 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / HIP / Windows | 1606.147107 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 2609.153346 samples/min Submissions: 16 | +62.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
