Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Matrox LUMA A310F
Intel Arc Pro A40

Matrox LUMA A310F vs Intel Arc Pro A40. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310F
Matrox LUMA A310F
Released
Q3/2022
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Arc Pro A40
Intel Arc Pro A40

What's the best choice Matrox LUMA A310F or Intel Arc Pro A40? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Matrox LUMA A310F has a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

Intel Arc Pro A40 has a maximum frequency of 1.5 GHz. Memory size 6 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q3/2022.

Differences

Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310F
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 25% better clock speed

    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.5 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310F GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2982 place
Videokards Reasons to consider
Intel Arc Pro A40
Report a bug
  • More memory

    33% more memory

    6 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Arc Pro A40 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Performance relative to other GPU chips
    34 place

Specifications

Technical data
Matrox LUMA A310F Matrox LUMA A310F
Intel Arc Pro A40 Intel Arc Pro A40
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F and Intel Arc Pro A40, chip, information processing units.

  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow DG2-128
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 128
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 32
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 64
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 6 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 16 Gbps
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 96 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F and Intel Arc Pro A40. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.5 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.7 GHz
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    50 W-33 % left arrow 50 W
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 3840x2160
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU Intel Arc Pro A40 and Matrox LUMA A310F.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x8
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q3/2022
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 6 nm

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Matrox LUMA A310F and Intel Arc Pro A40.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

Intel Arc Pro A40 Performance relative to other GPU chips
210%
Radeon RX 590
169%
Radeon RX 570
144%
Intel Arc A380
100%
85%
Radeon RX 560
-->

Latest comparisons