Intel Atom E3815
Intel Celeron N2920
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Atom E3815 vs Intel Celeron N2920. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2013
Intel Atom E3815
Intel Atom E3815
Released
Q4/2013
User rating
star star star star star
Intel Celeron N2920
Intel Celeron N2920

What's the best choice Intel Atom E3815 or Intel Celeron N2920? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Atom E3815 has a base frequency of 1.46 GHz. 1 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 5 W. Released in Q4/2013.

Intel Celeron N2920 has a base frequency of 1.86 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 7.5 W. Released in Q4/2013.

Differences

Intel Atom E3815 Reasons to consider
Intel Atom E3815
Report a bug
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    5 W left arrow 7.5 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Atom E3815 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1687 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    901 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    921 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    802 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    826 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    375 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1217 place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 27% better clock speed

    1.86 GHz left arrow 1.46 GHz
  • More number of cores

    3 more cores

    4 left arrow 1

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron N2920 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    549 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    486 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1031 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    999 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1600 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    863 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    808 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    779 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    754 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    353 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1095 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Atom E3815 Intel Atom E3815
Intel Celeron N2920 Intel Celeron N2920
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    Intel Atom E3800 left arrow Intel Celeron J1000/N2000
  • Family
    Intel Atom left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 6
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    1.46 GHz left arrow 1.86 GHz
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • CPU Cores
    1 left arrow 4
  • CPU Threads
    1 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 2 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    - left arrow 2 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    11.2 left arrow 11.2
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow 4
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 7
  • GPU Frequency
    400 MHz left arrow 310 MHz
  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
  • GPU Turbo
    400 MHz left arrow 840 MHz
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Release date
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q3/2013
  • Shader
    32 left arrow 32
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 22 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Celeron N2920 and Intel Atom E3815. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM
  • PCIe lanes
    - left arrow 4
  • PCIe version
    - left arrow 2.0
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Atom E3815 and Intel Celeron N2920 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    5 W left arrow 7.5 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Atom E3815 and Intel Celeron N2920, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Bay Trail left arrow Bay Trail
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    1.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Release date
    Q4/2013 left arrow Q4/2013
  • Socket
    BGA 1170 left arrow BGA 1170
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Atom E3815 and Intel Celeron N2920.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games

Higher values are better in this metric.

26.000000
Intel Atom E3815
54.000000
Intel Celeron N2920
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

591.000000
Intel Atom E3815
849.000000
Intel Celeron N2920
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Higher values are better in this metric.

591.000000
Intel Atom E3815
2715.000000
Intel Celeron N2920
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

0.270000
Intel Atom E3815
0.380000
Intel Celeron N2920
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

0.270000
Intel Atom E3815
1.400000
Intel Celeron N2920
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
The iGPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene, based on CINEMA 4D

Higher values are better in this metric.

4.700000
Intel Atom E3815
10.200000
Intel Celeron N2920
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

Higher values are better in this metric.

384.000000
Intel Atom E3815
1638.000000
Intel Celeron N2920

Latest comparisons