什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i7-12700 或 Intel Core i9-12900KF? 哪种处理器更快？
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i7-12700 has a base frequency of 2.10 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q4/2021.
Intel Core i9-12900KF has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 发布于 Q4/2021.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
125 W
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
更高的时钟速度
左右 76% 更好的时钟速度
2.10 GHz
更多的核心数量
4 more cores
12
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 10 % higher specified turbo frequency
4.80 GHz
共同立场 Intel Core i9-12900KF 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i7-12700
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Intel Core i 12000
Intel Core i9
12
Intel Core i9-11900KF
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
8x Golden Cove
8x Gracemont
3.7 GHz
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
16
24
是
是
5.3 GHz
-
5 GHz
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
-
-
-
-
None
-
-
-
-
-
-
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode
Decode / Encode
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i9-12900KF 和 Intel Core i7-12700. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
没有
256 GB
2
DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
20
5.0
是
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i7-12700 和 Intel Core i9-12900KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
125 W
228 W / 56 s
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i7-12700 和 Intel Core i9-12900KF, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Alder Lake S
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
3.75 MB
30 MB
BX8071512900KF
Q4/2021
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Shared tests with results for both models: 6
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-12700 | Intel Core i9-12900KF | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 222.861879 samples/min Submissions: 25 | 346.043984 samples/min Submissions: 28 | +55.3 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 235.615566 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 323.798146 samples/min Submissions: 11 | +37.4 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 214.261564 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 329.41883 samples/min Submissions: 14 | +53.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 223.046296 samples/min Submissions: 25 | 327.858488 samples/min Submissions: 24 | +47.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 212.631414 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 335.27653 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +57.7 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 238.772898 samples/min Submissions: 28 | 340.815064 samples/min Submissions: 22 | +42.7 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
