ベストな選択とは Intel Core i7-12700 または Intel Core i9-12900KF? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i7-12700 has a base frequency of 2.10 GHz. 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2021.
Intel Core i9-12900KF has a base frequency of 3.70 GHz. 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2021.
考慮すべき理由 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
クロックの高速化
周辺 76% クロックスピードの向上
より多くのコア数
4 more cores
ターボクロックの高速化
周辺 10 % higher specified turbo frequency
共通ポジション Intel Core i9-12900KF 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
Intel Core i7-12700
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 Intel Core i9-12900KF と Intel Core i7-12700. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する Intel Core i7-12700 と Intel Core i9-12900KF Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 Intel Core i7-12700 と Intel Core i9-12900KF, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 6
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-12700 | Intel Core i9-12900KF | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 222.861879 samples/min Submissions: 25 | 346.043984 samples/min Submissions: 28 | +55.3 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 235.615566 samples/min Submissions: 32 | 323.798146 samples/min Submissions: 11 | +37.4 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 214.261564 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 329.41883 samples/min Submissions: 14 | +53.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 223.046296 samples/min Submissions: 25 | 327.858488 samples/min Submissions: 24 | +47.0 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 212.631414 samples/min Submissions: 16 | 335.27653 samples/min Submissions: 7 | +57.7 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 238.772898 samples/min Submissions: 28 | 340.815064 samples/min Submissions: 22 | +42.7 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-12700 | 6523.540195 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Dell Inc. / 0Y08K8 Duration: 153.291 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-12900KF | 10268.669468 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 10M / 22 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / MEG Z690 ACE (MS-7D27) Duration: 973.836 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |