Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Matrox LUMA A310
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Matrox LUMA A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310
Matrox LUMA A310
Released
Q4/2022
Overall score
star star star star star
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

What's the best choice Matrox LUMA A310 or NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Matrox LUMA A310 has a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 has a maximum frequency of 2.235 GHz. Memory size 24 GB. Memory type GDDR6X. Released in Q4/2022.

Differences

Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310
Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2981 place
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 11% better clock speed

    2.235 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • More memory

    83% more memory

    24 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
Matrox LUMA A310 Matrox LUMA A310
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow AD102-300 / AD102-301 (Ada Lovelace)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    96 left arrow 128
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 16384
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 192
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 512
  • Raytracing Cores
    6 left arrow 128
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 24 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6X
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 1.313 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 21.0 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    124 GB/s left arrow 1008 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 384 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.235 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.520 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    30 W-60 % left arrow 450 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow 450 W-25 %
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow 90 °C
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow --
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Matrox LUMA A310 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

  • Fan-Type
    -- left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    -- left arrow 2 x 110 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Passive left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow 39 dB
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    -- left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow 3x DP v1.4a
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    168 mm left arrow 304 mm
  • Height
    69 mm left arrow 137 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 61 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and Matrox LUMA A310.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow 1,599 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 4 nm
  • Part-no
    LUMA-A310 left arrow --
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Matrox LUMA A310 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310
82.58
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
-->

Latest comparisons