What's the best choice Samsung Exynos 3475 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 690? Which processor is faster?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Samsung Exynos 3475 has a base frequency of 1.30 GHz. 4 / 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in 2015.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 has a base frequency of 1.70 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q4/2020.
Reasons to consider Common positions Samsung Exynos 3475 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 31% better clock speed
More number of cores
4 more cores
Higher turbo clock speed
Around 54 % higher specified turbo frequency
Common positions Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Samsung Exynos 3475
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 and Samsung Exynos 3475. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Samsung Exynos 3475 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Samsung Exynos 3475 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 690, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.