Intel Celeron G1610
AMD Athlon X4 845
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron G1610 vs AMD Athlon X4 845. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2013
Intel Celeron G1610
Intel Celeron G1610
Released
Q1/2016
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Athlon X4 845
AMD Athlon X4 845

What's the best choice Intel Celeron G1610 or AMD Athlon X4 845? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Celeron G1610 has a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz. 2 Cores. Power consumption of 55 W. Released in Q1/2013.

AMD Athlon X4 845 has a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz. 4 Cores. Power consumption of 65 W. Released in Q1/2016.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1497 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    55 W left arrow 65 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron G1610 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    834 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    928 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1141 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1341 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1567 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    617 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    730 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    598 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    752 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    368 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1129 place
AMD Athlon X4 845 Reasons to consider
AMD Athlon X4 845
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1048 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 26% better clock speed

    3.50 GHz left arrow 2.60 GHz
  • More number of cores

    About 2 times more cores

    4 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Athlon X4 845 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    832 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    709 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    536 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    418 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    416 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    420 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    765 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron G1610 Intel Celeron G1610
AMD Athlon X4 845 AMD Athlon X4 845
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow AMD Athlon
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron G1000 left arrow AMD Athlon X4 (Carizzo)
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    2.60 GHz left arrow 3.50 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 3.80 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    0.65 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    1.05 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    6 left arrow
  • Shader
    48 left arrow
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow
  • Generation
    7 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    11.0 left arrow
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q4/2012 left arrow
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Athlon X4 845 and Intel Celeron G1610. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1333 left arrow DDR3-2133
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    16 left arrow 8
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Celeron G1610 and AMD Athlon X4 845 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    55 W left arrow 65 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron G1610 and Intel Celeron G1610, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow None
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE3
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Ivy Bridge S left arrow Carizzo
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 1155 left arrow FM2+
  • Release date
    Q1/2013 left arrow Q1/2016

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Celeron G1610 and AMD Athlon X4 845.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
92
Intel Celeron G1610
93
AMD Athlon X4 845
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
174
Intel Celeron G1610
316
AMD Athlon X4 845
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
2023
Intel Celeron G1610
2526
AMD Athlon X4 845
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
3522
Intel Celeron G1610
8576
AMD Athlon X4 845
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
0.97
Intel Celeron G1610
1.04
AMD Athlon X4 845
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
1.92
Intel Celeron G1610
4.03
AMD Athlon X4 845
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
2551
Intel Celeron G1610
5917
AMD Athlon X4 845

Latest comparisons