Was ist die beste Wahl? AMD EPYC 9274F oder Intel Core i9-13900K? Welcher Prozessor ist schneller?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD EPYC 9274F has a base frequency of 4.05 GHz. 24 / 48 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 320 W. Freigegeben in Q4/2022.
Intel Core i9-13900K has a base frequency of 3.80 GHz. 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Freigegeben in Q4/2022.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Höhere Taktfrequenz
Rund um 7% höhere taktfrequenz
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Platz in der Gesamtwertung
(basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Core i9-13900K CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
AMD EPYC 9274F
Hintergrundinformationen zu den verglichenen Prozessoren, Serien, Generationen und Marktsegmenten.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Interne Grafik beeinträchtigt nicht die Leistung der CPU, sondern übernimmt die Arbeit der Grafikkarte bei deren Abwesenheit oder auf mobilen Geräten.
Integrierte Codecs für die Kodierung und Dekodierung von Inhalten. Erhebliche Beschleunigung der erforderlichen Vorgänge.
Typen, Kanalmenge des RAM, unterstützt von Intel Core i9-13900K und AMD EPYC 9274F. Je nach Motherboard können höhere oder niedrigere Speicherfrequenzen unterstützt werden.
Vergleichen Sie die TDP-Anforderungen von TDP AMD EPYC 9274F und Intel Core i9-13900K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architektur, Schnittstellen, zusätzliche Anweisungen, die von AMD EPYC 9274F und Intel Core i9-13900K, Technologien für virtuelle Maschinen und Verfahrenstechnik.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6191 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 327 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 15181 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 828 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 40103 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2267 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | 9028.644277 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B760M-H2/M.2 Duration: 1107.586 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9274F | 23028.580772 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 48 threads / linux System RAM: 512 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / K14PA-U24 Series Duration: 434.243 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |