What's the best choice Elbrus-4S or Intel Xeon E7-2880 v2? Which processor is faster?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Elbrus-4S has a base frequency of 0.8 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. Released in Q4/2014.
Intel Xeon E7-2880 v2 has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 15 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 130 W. Released in Q1/2014.
Reasons to consider Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
130 W
Common positions Elbrus-4S CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
No data
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 213% better clock speed
0.8 GHz
More number of cores
11 more cores
4
Common positions Intel Xeon E7-2880 v2 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
No data
Elbrus-4S
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Intel Xeon E7 v2
Intel Xeon E7
Desktop / Server
4
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
2.5 GHz
15
30
normal
Yes
No
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
no iGPU
No turbo
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Xeon E7-2880 v2 and Elbrus-4S. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
DDR3-1600
Yes
4
Yes
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Elbrus-4S and Intel Xeon E7-2880 v2 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
130 W
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Elbrus-4S and Intel Xeon E7-2880 v2, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
-
Q1/2014
LGA 2011
22 nm
Ivy Bridge EX
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
38 MB
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
