What's the best choice Elbrus-16S or AMD FX-6300? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Elbrus-16S has a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz. 16 Cores. Power consumption of 130 W. Released in Q4/2021.
AMD FX-6300 has a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz. 6 Cores. Power consumption of 95 W. Released in Q4/2012.
Reasons to consider More number of cores
10 times more cores
6
Common positions Elbrus-16S CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
score
Higher clock speed
Around 43% better clock speed
2.0 GHz
Performance per watt
About 0.73 times less performance per watt
130 W
Common positions AMD FX-6300 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Elbrus-16S
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Desktop / Server
AMD FX
Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.
3.50 GHz
6
6
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD FX-6300 and Elbrus-16S. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
2
No
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Elbrus-16S and AMD FX-6300 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
95 W
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Elbrus-16S and Elbrus-16S, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
--
8.00 MB
32 nm
AM3+
Q4/2012
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Elbrus-16S and AMD FX-6300.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
