Elbrus-16S
Baikal-T1
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Elbrus-16S vs Baikal-T1. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2022
Elbrus-16S
Elbrus-16S
Released
Q4/2016
User rating
star star star star star
Baikal-T1
Baikal-T1

What's the best choice Elbrus-16S or Baikal-T1? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Elbrus-16S has a base frequency of 2.0 GHz. 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 130 W. Released in Q2/2022.

Baikal-T1 has a base frequency of 1.2 GHz. 2 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 5 W. Released in Q4/2016.

Differences

Elbrus-16S Reasons to consider
Elbrus-16S
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 67% better clock speed

    2.0 GHz left arrow 1.2 GHz
  • More number of cores

    14 more cores

    16 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Elbrus-16S CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    592 place
  • CoreMark
    2 place
Baikal-T1 Reasons to consider
Baikal-T1
Report a bug
  • Lower stated TDP / base power

    Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

    5 W left arrow 130 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Baikal-T1 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • CoreMark
    5 place

Specifications

Technical data
Elbrus-16S Elbrus-16S
Baikal-T1 Baikal-T1
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Family
    Elbrus left arrow Baikal
  • Generation
    Elbrus-6 left arrow -
  • Segment
    Desktop left arrow Desktop
  • CPU group
    - left arrow Baikal-T
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    2 GHz left arrow 1.2 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    16 left arrow 2
  • CPU Threads
    16 left arrow 2
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Baikal-T1 and Elbrus-16S. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    8 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    DDR4-3200 left arrow DDR3-1600
  • Max. Memory
    - left arrow 64
  • PCIe lanes
    - left arrow 4
  • PCIe version
    - left arrow 3.0
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Elbrus-16S and Baikal-T1 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • TDP (PL1, legacy label)
    130 W left arrow 5 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Elbrus-16S and Baikal-T1, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • L1-Cache (layout)
    (64 + 128) / core left arrow -
  • L2-Cache
    16 MB left arrow 1 MB
  • L3-Cache
    32 MB left arrow -
  • Release date
    Q2/2022 left arrow -
  • Socket
    HFCBGA 4804 left arrow -
  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Ethernet
    - left arrow 10 Gb
  • SATA
    - left arrow 3.0
  • USB
    - left arrow 2.0

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Elbrus-16S and Baikal-T1.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

CoreMark
CoreMark - a set of synthetic performance tests to measure the speed of central processors in embedded systems

Higher values are better in this metric.

76232.000000
Elbrus-16S
13142.000000
Baikal-T1

Latest comparisons