What's the best choice Elbrus-16S or Baikal-T1? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Elbrus-16S has a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz. 16 Cores. Power consumption of 130 W. Released in Q4/2021.
Baikal-T1 has a maximum frequency of 1.2 GHz. 2 Cores. Power consumption of 3.9 W. Released in Q4/2016.
Reasons to consider Higher clock speed
Around 40% better clock speed
1.2 GHz
More number of cores
14 times more cores
2
Common positions Elbrus-16S CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Performance per watt
About 0.03 times less performance per watt
130 W
Common positions Baikal-T1 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Elbrus-16S
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Desktop
Baikal
Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.
1.2 GHz
2
2
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Baikal-T1 and Elbrus-16S. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
DDR3-1600
2
Yes
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Elbrus-16S and Baikal-T1 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
5 W
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Elbrus-16S and Elbrus-16S, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
1.00 MB
28 nm
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Elbrus-16S and Baikal-T1.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
