Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
选择处理器2
选择视频卡1
选择视频卡2
User rating
star star star star star
已发布
Q4/2023
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

产品系列示意图。

处理器 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 规格和基准

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H处理器正在接受审查,其发布时间为Q4/2023。以下是Intel Core Ultra 7 155H的所有规格和性能估计的基准。我们提出要研究所有的数据,并与一个竞争模型进行比较。该模型的基本时钟频率为1.4 GHz,核心总数为 16 / 22 。CPU支持,并安装在主板的FCBGA2049上。CPU的TDP是28 W。

规格

技术数据
处理器的生成和系列
  • 系列
    Intel Core Ultra Series 1
  • 命名
    Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  • 分段
    Mobile
CPU内核和基本频率
  • CPU核数
    16
  • CPU线程
    22
  • E-core Base Clock
    0.9 GHz
  • Efficient Cores
    8
  • Low Power Efficient-cores
    2
  • Max. Boost Clock
    4.8 GHz
  • P-core Base Clock
    1.4 GHz
  • Performance Cores
    6
内部图形
  • GPU名称
    Intel Arc graphics
  • GPU Turbo
    2250 MHz
内存和PCIe
  • 最大内存
    96 GB
  • 记忆通道
    2
  • 存储器类型
    Up to LPDDR5/X 7467 MT/s
能源消耗
  • Maximum Turbo Power
    115 W
  • Minimum Assured Power
    20 W
  • TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)
    28 W
技术细节
  • L2-Cache
    24 MB
  • Official specification sheet
    https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/851467/Intel-Core-Ultra-Series1-Series2-Series3-Comparison.pdf
  • 发布日期
    Q4/2023
  • 插座
    FCBGA2049
所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.

No data

基准

性能测试 CPU

Published results: 14

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settingsIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows 172.023937 samples/min Submissions: 27
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux 208.046252 samples/min Submissions: 5
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 167.768255 samples/min Submissions: 44
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux 184.723177 samples/min Submissions: 18
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 167.713327 samples/min Submissions: 51
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux 192.842865 samples/min Submissions: 8
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 145.945895 samples/min Submissions: 63
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux 186.056374 samples/min Submissions: 14
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 142.731163 samples/min Submissions: 24
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux 245.133456 samples/min Submissions: 6
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 148.202787 samples/min Submissions: 53
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 160.268669 samples/min Submissions: 12
More tests: 2
Test and settingsIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 180.503255 samples/min Submissions: 6
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 138.974865 samples/min Submissions: 9

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
1022 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
106 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 20 threads / linux

ResultReported conditions
3330.713172 H/s RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 20 threads / linux
System RAM: 16 GB
OS: Linux x86_64
Duration: 300.236 s
User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
18497 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
1771 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
7188 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
679 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R15 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
2738 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R15 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
258 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Comparable benchmark results are required to suggest performance alternatives.

*

PL1 is the sustained processor power limit; PL2 is the short-term turbo power limit. They are not measured performance or efficiency.

这些数值被用来选择最佳的冷却系统和电源。

给处理器打分
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

最新比较