Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs AMD Ryzen 5 3501U

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

报告一个错误

更多的核心数量

12 more cores

16 4
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度

左右 30% higher specified turbo frequency

4.8 GHz 3.7 GHz

需要考虑的原因
AMD Ryzen 5 3501U

报告一个错误

更高的时钟速度

左右 50% 更好的时钟速度

2.1 GHz 1.4 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

15 W 28 W

规格

技术数据

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

AMD Ryzen 5 3501U

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

系列

Intel Core Ultra Series 1 Ryzen
分段

Mobile Mobile
Form Factor

- Laptops / Desktops
Series

- Ryzen 3000 Series

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

CPU核数

16 4
CPU线程

22 8
E-core Base Clock

0.9 GHz -
Efficient Cores

8 -
Low Power Efficient-cores

2 -
Max. Boost Clock

4.8 GHz 3.7 GHz
P-core Base Clock

1.4 GHz -
Performance Cores

6 -
Base Frequency

- 2.1 GHz
超频

- 没有

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

GPU名称

Intel Arc graphics Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
GPU Turbo

2250 MHz -
GPU Frequency

- 1200 MHz
Graphics Cores

- 8

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen 5 3501U 和 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

最大内存

96 GB -
记忆通道

2 2
存储器类型

Up to LPDDR5/X 7467 MT/s -
PCIe

- PCIe 3.0
System Memory Specification

- 2400

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 和 AMD Ryzen 5 3501U Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Turbo Power

115 W -
Minimum Assured Power

20 W -
TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)

28 W -
Configurable TDP

- 12-35 W
Default TDP

- 15 W
Maximum Operating Temperature

- 105 °C

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 和 AMD Ryzen 5 3501U, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

L2-Cache

24 MB 4 MB
Official specification sheet

https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/851467/Intel-Core-Ultra-Series1-Series2-Series3-Comparison.pdf -
发布日期

Q4/2023 Q2/2026
插座

FCBGA2049 FP5
Codename

- Picasso
L2-Cache

- 2 MB
技术过程

- 12nm

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows 172.023937 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux 208.046252 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 167.768255 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux 184.723177 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 167.713327 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux 192.842865 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 145.945895 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux 186.056374 samples/min

More results: 6

Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 142.731163 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux 245.133456 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 148.202787 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 160.268669 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 180.503255 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 138.974865 samples/min

AMD Ryzen 5 3501U

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1022 points	System: Acemagic F2A CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W Graphics: Arc 8-Core RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	106 points	System: Acemagic F2A CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W Graphics: Arc 8-Core RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 20 threads / linux

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3330.713172 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 20 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Duration: 300.236 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18497 points	System: Acemagic F2A CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W Graphics: Arc 8-Core RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1771 points	System: Acemagic F2A CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W Graphics: Arc 8-Core RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7188 points	System: Acemagic F2A CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W Graphics: Arc 8-Core RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	679 points	System: Acemagic F2A CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W Graphics: Arc 8-Core RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R15 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2738 points	System: Acemagic F2A CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W Graphics: Arc 8-Core RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R15 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	258 points	System: Acemagic F2A CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W Graphics: Arc 8-Core RAM: 32 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.