Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Sélectionner le processeur 2
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 1
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 2
User rating
star star star star star
Libéré
Q4/2023
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

Illustration de la gamme.

Processeur Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, spécifications et caractéristiques de référence

Sur le processeur d'aperçu Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, dont la sortie a eu lieu Q4/2023. Voici toutes les caractéristiques techniques et l'évaluation des performances de Intel Core Ultra 7 155H dans les benchmarks. Nous suggérons d'examiner toutes les données et de les comparer avec le modèle concurrentiel. La fréquence d'horloge de base du modèle est 1.4 GHz, tous les cœurs sont 16 / 22. Le processeur prend en charge et est installé sur la carte mère sur FCBGA2049. Le TDP estimé pour CPU est de 28 W.

Spécifications

Données techniques
Génération et série de processeurs
  • Série
    Intel Core Ultra Series 1
  • Nom
    Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  • Segment
    Mobile
Cœurs du CPU et fréquence de base
  • Cœurs de CPU
    16
  • Fils de processeur
    22
  • E-core Base Clock
    0.9 GHz
  • Efficient Cores
    8
  • Low Power Efficient-cores
    2
  • Max. Boost Clock
    4.8 GHz
  • P-core Base Clock
    1.4 GHz
  • Performance Cores
    6
Graphiques internes
  • Nom du GPU
    Intel Arc graphics
  • GPU Turbo
    2250 MHz
Mémoire et PCIe
  • Max. Mémoire
    96 GB
  • Canaux de mémoire
    2
  • Type de mémoire
    Up to LPDDR5/X 7467 MT/s
Consommation d'énergie
  • Maximum Turbo Power
    115 W
  • Minimum Assured Power
    20 W
  • TDP (PL1 / PBP, legacy combined label)
    28 W
Détails techniques
  • L3-Cache
    24 MB
  • Official specification sheet
    https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/851467/Intel-Core-Ultra-Series1-Series2-Series3-Comparison.pdf
  • Date de sortie
    Q4/2023
  • Socket
    FCBGA2049
Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes Intel Core Ultra 7 155H CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

No data

Benchmarks

Tests de performance CPU

Published results: 14

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settingsIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows 172.023937 samples/min Submissions: 27
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux 208.046252 samples/min Submissions: 5
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 167.768255 samples/min Submissions: 44
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux 184.723177 samples/min Submissions: 18
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 167.713327 samples/min Submissions: 51
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux 192.842865 samples/min Submissions: 8
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 145.945895 samples/min Submissions: 63
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux 186.056374 samples/min Submissions: 14
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 142.731163 samples/min Submissions: 24
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux 245.133456 samples/min Submissions: 6
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 148.202787 samples/min Submissions: 53
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 160.268669 samples/min Submissions: 12
More tests: 2
Test and settingsIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 180.503255 samples/min Submissions: 6
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 138.974865 samples/min Submissions: 9

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
1022 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
106 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 20 threads / linux

ResultReported conditions
3330.713172 H/s RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 1M / 20 threads / linux
System RAM: 16 GB
OS: Linux x86_64
Duration: 300.236 s
User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
18497 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
1771 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
7188 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
679 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R15 / multiple threads

ResultReported conditions
2738 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R15 / single thread

ResultReported conditions
258 points System: Acemagic F2A
CPU / power label: Ultra 7 155H 90 W / 65 W
Graphics: Arc 8-Core
RAM: 32 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Comparable benchmark results are required to suggest performance alternatives.

*

PL1 is the sustained processor power limit; PL2 is the short-term turbo power limit. They are not measured performance or efficiency.

Ces valeurs sont utilisées pour sélectionner le système de refroidissement et l'alimentation électrique optimaux.

Évaluez le processeur
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

Dernières comparaisons