什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i7-12700H 或 Intel Core i5-1240P? 哪种处理器更快?
我们准备了一份比较,帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
Intel Core i7-12700H has a base frequency of 2.30 GHz. 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
Intel Core i5-1240P has a base frequency of 1.70 GHz. 12 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 28 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
更高的时钟速度
左右 35% 更好的时钟速度
更多的核心数量
2 more cores
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 7% higher specified turbo frequency
共同立场 Intel Core i7-12700H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Intel Core i5-1240P 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i7-12700H
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i5-1240P 和 Intel Core i7-12700H. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i7-12700H 和 Intel Core i5-1240P Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i7-12700H 和 Intel Core i5-1240P, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 5
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-12700H | Intel Core i5-1240P | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 179.157041 samples/min Submissions: 13 | 98.841742 samples/min Submissions: 5 | -44.8 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 173.836398 samples/min Submissions: 39 | 95.40662 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -45.1 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 166.642257 samples/min Submissions: 57 | 112.270171 samples/min Submissions: 6 | -32.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 171.496699 samples/min Submissions: 27 | 114.951181 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -33.0 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 185.722833 samples/min Submissions: 88 | 109.954992 samples/min Submissions: 9 | -40.8 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-12700H | 6305.822292 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 17 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: LENOVO / INVALID Duration: 1585.836 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-1240P | 1764.34056 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 12 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / X1502ZA Duration: 566.784 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果,你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i7-12700H 和 Intel Core i5-1240P.
比较合成测试值,选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.