共同立场 Intel Core i7-12700H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
Published results: 17
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-12700H |
|---|---|
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 282.531205 samples/min Submissions: 5 |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 185.722833 samples/min Submissions: 88 |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Linux | 210.522717 samples/min Submissions: 10 |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 171.496699 samples/min Submissions: 27 |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 227.527826 samples/min Submissions: 12 |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 166.642257 samples/min Submissions: 57 |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Linux | 220.248805 samples/min Submissions: 9 |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 173.836398 samples/min Submissions: 39 |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Linux | 160.170807 samples/min Submissions: 5 |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 194.511825 samples/min Submissions: 44 |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux | 183.839528 samples/min Submissions: 20 |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 171.366816 samples/min Submissions: 53 |
| Test and settings | Intel Core i7-12700H |
|---|---|
| Blender 5.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 218.186226 samples/min Submissions: 7 |
| Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 189.136701 samples/min Submissions: 6 |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Linux | 201.516106 samples/min Submissions: 25 |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 171.747624 samples/min Submissions: 8 |
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 177.564768 samples/min Submissions: 11 |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|
| 6305.822292 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 10M / 17 threads / linux System RAM: 64 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: LENOVO / INVALID Duration: 1585.836 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
比较流行基准的分数 Intel Core i7-12700H 与其他处理器相比，了解CPU处理内容时的真实速度.
测试包括数学计算、创建3D模型、加密货币挖掘、单核和多核模式下的测试.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted. Index 0–100: equal-weight mean of each score relative to the best saved score among models with both tests. Tests: Cinebench R23 Multi-Core + Geekbench 5 Multi-Core. This index does not predict performance in every workload.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
*
PL1 is the sustained processor power limit; PL2 is the short-term turbo power limit. They are not measured performance or efficiency.
这些数值被用来选择最佳的冷却系统和电源。
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
