什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i5-13500HX 或 Intel Core i5-13400F? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i5-13500HX has a base frequency of 1.50 GHz (4.70 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
Intel Core i5-13400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz). 10 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
4 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
共同立场 Intel Core i5-13500HX 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
共同立场 Intel Core i5-13400F 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i5-13500HX
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i5-13400F 和 Intel Core i5-13500HX. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-13500HX 和 Intel Core i5-13400F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-13500HX 和 Intel Core i5-13400F, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 4
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-13500HX | Intel Core i5-13400F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 179.637853 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 194.431037 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +8.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 218.555412 samples/min Submissions: 21 | 180.143499 samples/min Submissions: 33 | -17.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 229.204276 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 198.561504 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -13.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 223.399093 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 191.443574 samples/min Submissions: 42 | -14.3 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | 5494.082873 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 14 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / B760M GAMING PLUS WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D99) Duration: 182.014 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13500HX | 6394.516063 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 156.384 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |