Cuál es la mejor opción Intel Core i5-13500HX o Intel Core i5-13400F? ¿Qué procesador es más rápido?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i5-13500HX has a base frequency of 1.50 GHz (4.70 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. Publicado en Q1/2023.
Intel Core i5-13400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz). 10 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Publicado en Q1/2023.
Razones a tener en cuenta Más número de núcleos
4 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Posiciones comunes Intel Core i5-13500HX CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
Posiciones comunes Intel Core i5-13400F CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Intel Core i5-13500HX
Información sobre los procesadores que se comparan, serie, generación y segmento de mercado.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La gráfica interna no afecta al rendimiento de la CPU, realiza el trabajo de la tarjeta gráfica en su ausencia o en dispositivos móviles.
Códecs incorporados para codificar y descodificar contenidos. Acelera significativamente las operaciones necesarias.
Tipos, cantidad de canales de RAM soportados por Intel Core i5-13400F y Intel Core i5-13500HX. Dependiendo de las placas base, pueden admitirse frecuencias de memoria más altas o más bajas.
Compara los requisitos del TDP Intel Core i5-13500HX y Intel Core i5-13400F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Arquitectura, interfaces, instrucciones adicionales soportadas por Intel Core i5-13500HX y Intel Core i5-13400F, tecnologías de máquinas virtuales y tecnología de procesos.
Shared tests with results for both models: 4
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-13500HX | Intel Core i5-13400F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 179.637853 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 194.431037 samples/min Submissions: 18 | +8.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 218.555412 samples/min Submissions: 21 | 180.143499 samples/min Submissions: 33 | -17.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 229.204276 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 198.561504 samples/min Submissions: 24 | -13.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 223.399093 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 191.443574 samples/min Submissions: 42 | -14.3 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | 5494.082873 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 14 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / B760M GAMING PLUS WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D99) Duration: 182.014 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13500HX | 6394.516063 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 156.384 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |