Intel Core i5-13400F vs AMD EPYC 9654

差异
 规格基准褒奖

差异

需要考虑的原因
Intel Core i5-13400F

报告一个错误

在总排名中的位置

(基于几个基准)

69 地点
Lower stated TDP / base power

Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.

65 W 360 W

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Core i5-13400F 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

35 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

65 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

103 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

117 place

需要考虑的原因
AMD EPYC 9654

报告一个错误

更多的核心数量

86 more cores

96 10

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 AMD EPYC 9654 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

579 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

1 place

规格

技术数据

Intel Core i5-13400F

AMD EPYC 9654

CPU家族和团体

有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。

CPU组

Intel Core i 13000 AMD EPYC 9004
系列

Intel Core i5 AMD EPYC
一代人

13 4
过去的模式

Intel Core i5-12400 -
分段

Desktop / Server Desktop / Server

CPU技术规格

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

A-Core

6x Raptor Cove -
A-Core Frequency

2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) -
B-Core

4x Gracemont -
B-Core Frequency

2.50 GHz (3.30 GHz) -
核心架构

hybrid (big.LITTLE) normal
CPU核数

10 96
CPU线程

16 192
Hyperthreading / SMT

是是
超频

没有没有
Base Frequency

- 2.4 GHz
Core Configuration

- 96x Zen 4
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

- 3.7 GHz
Turbo Frequency (96 Cores)

- 3.55 GHz

IGPU

内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。

GPU名称

None 没有iGPU
GPU Turbo

- 没有涡轮增压

硬件编解码器支持

用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。

AV1

没有没有
H.264 / AVC

没有没有
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)

没有没有
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)

没有没有
JPEG

没有没有
VC-1

没有没有
VP8

没有没有
VP9

没有没有

内存规格和PCI

支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD EPYC 9654 和 Intel Core i5-13400F. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。

ECC

是是
最大内存

128 GB 6144 GB
Memory Bandwidth

89.6 GB/s 461 GB/s
记忆通道

2 (Dual Channel) 12
存储器类型

DDR5-4800 DDR5-4800
PCIe

5.0 x 20 5.0 x 128

加密

AES-NI

是是

能源消耗

比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-13400F 和 AMD EPYC 9654 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Maximum Operating Temperature

100 °C 100 °C
TDP (PL1, legacy label)

65 W 360 W
TDP (PL2)

117 W -
TDP down

- 320 W
TDP up

- 400 W

技术和扩展

架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-13400F 和 AMD EPYC 9654, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。

建筑学

Alder Lake S Refresh Genoa (Zen 4)
Chip design

Monolithic Chiplet
规格

- Technical data sheet
指令集（ISA）

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA扩展

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+ SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI
L2-Cache

20 MB 96 MB
L2-Cache

20 MB 384 MB
Operating systems

Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11
Part Number

- 100-000000789
发布日期

Q1/2023 Q4/2022
Release price

- 11805 $
插座

LGA 1700 SP5
技术过程

10 nm 5 nm
虚拟化

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d AMD-V, SVM

基准

性能测试 CPUs

Shared tests with results for both models: 1

Blender Cycles

Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.

Test and settings	Intel Core i5-13400F	AMD EPYC 9654	Result difference¹
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Linux	241.07086 samples/min Submissions: 16	2052.589329 samples/min Submissions: 6	+751.4 %

¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

Intel Core i5-13400F

Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows 191.443574 samples/min
Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows 198.561504 samples/min
Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows 180.143499 samples/min
Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows 185.751865 samples/min
Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows 194.431037 samples/min
Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows 200.318835 samples/min
Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 203.0258 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 199.355566 samples/min

More results: 1

Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 196.492103 samples/min

AMD EPYC 9654

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 14 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
Intel Core i5-13400F	5494.082873 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 14 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / B760M GAMING PLUS WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D99) Duration: 182.014 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 1M / 96 threads / windows

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD EPYC 9654	53461.641272 H/s	RandomX / XMRig 6.21.0 / 1M / 96 threads / windows System RAM: 160 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Supermicro / H13SSL-N Duration: 18.705 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete.

根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i5-13400F 和 AMD EPYC 9654.

比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 SC是一个流行的跨平台性能测试，适用于密集使用系统内存的桌面或移动处理器。

Higher values are better in this metric.

1644.000000

Intel Core i5-13400F

846.000000

AMD EPYC 9654

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 MC是一个流行的跨平台性能测试，适用于密集使用系统内存的桌面或移动处理器。

Higher values are better in this metric.

10309.000000