什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i5-13500 或 Intel Core i5-12400F? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i5-13500 has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz (5.20 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
Intel Core i5-12400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
8 more cores
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 9% higher specified turbo frequency
共同立场 Intel Core i5-13500 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
共同立场 Intel Core i5-12400F 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i5-13500
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i5-12400F 和 Intel Core i5-13500. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i5-13500 和 Intel Core i5-12400F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i5-13500 和 Intel Core i5-12400F, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 7
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i5-13500 | Intel Core i5-12400F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 261.585647 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 154.23191 samples/min Submissions: 94 | -41.0 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 255.149947 samples/min Submissions: 6 | 146.386328 samples/min Submissions: 40 | -42.6 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 215.962394 samples/min Submissions: 11 | 145.751849 samples/min Submissions: 65 | -32.5 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 248.528431 samples/min Submissions: 31 | 148.953521 samples/min Submissions: 121 | -40.1 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 265.346667 samples/min Submissions: 20 | 158.67054 samples/min Submissions: 58 | -40.2 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Linux | 279.768911 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 197.430931 samples/min Submissions: 19 | -29.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 242.080704 samples/min Submissions: 75 | 157.851555 samples/min Submissions: 96 | -34.8 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13500 | 7227.73136 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / MAG B760 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D96) Duration: 138.356 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 8041.558776 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 9 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Motherboard: ASRock / B660M PG Riptide Duration: 124.354 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |