什么是最好的选择 Apple M2 Pro 或 Apple M2 Max? 哪种处理器更快？
我们准备了一份比较，帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
Apple M2 Pro has a base frequency of 3.50 GHz. 12 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 Q2/2022.
Apple M2 Max has a base frequency of 3.50 GHz. 12 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 Q2/2022.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
共同立场 Apple M2 Pro 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 在总排名中的位置
(基于几个基准)
地点
共同立场 Apple M2 Max 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
Apple M2 Pro
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Apple M2
Apple M series
2
Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
Mobile
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
8x Avalanche
3.5 GHz
4x Blizzard
2.8 GHz
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
12
12
没有
没有
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
512
2
1400 MHz
Apple M2 Max (32 Core)
没有涡轮增压
2
32 GB
Q4/2022
4096
5 nm
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
没有
Conflicting source values: Decode | Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode
Decode / Encode
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Apple M2 Max 和 Apple M2 Pro. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
没有
64 GB
409.6 GB/s
2 (Dual Channel)
LPDDR5-6400
4.0
是
比较TDP的要求 Apple M2 Pro 和 Apple M2 Max Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
45 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Apple M2 Pro 和 Apple M2 Max, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
M2
Chiplet
ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation
36 MB
macOS, iPadOS
Q2/2022
5 nm
Apple Virtualization Framework
Shared tests with results for both models: 8
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Apple M2 Pro | Apple M2 Max | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / macOS | 191.318887 samples/min Submissions: 10 | 244.026185 samples/min Submissions: 14 | +27.5 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / macOS | 240.697281 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 252.073585 samples/min Submissions: 6 | +4.7 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / macOS | 205.788253 samples/min Submissions: 40 | 260.614786 samples/min Submissions: 37 | +26.6 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / macOS | 197.741186 samples/min Submissions: 15 | 256.002466 samples/min Submissions: 29 | +29.5 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / macOS | 202.698394 samples/min Submissions: 30 | 251.735668 samples/min Submissions: 35 | +24.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / macOS | 196.971498 samples/min Submissions: 44 | 250.486086 samples/min Submissions: 45 | +27.2 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / macOS | 198.991429 samples/min Submissions: 31 | 248.975534 samples/min Submissions: 19 | +25.1 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / macOS | 197.768517 samples/min Submissions: 67 | 254.020312 samples/min Submissions: 65 | +28.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Apple M2 Pro 和 Apple M2 Max.
比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
