什么是最好的选择 AMD Phenom II X4 965 或 Intel Celeron N3450? 哪种处理器更快？
我们准备了一份比较，帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
AMD Phenom II X4 965 has a base frequency of 3.40 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 140 W. 发布于 Q3/2009.
Intel Celeron N3450 has a base frequency of 1.10 GHz. 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 6 W. 发布于 Q3/2016.
需要考虑的原因 更高的时钟速度
左右 209% 更好的时钟速度
1.10 GHz
共同立场 AMD Phenom II X4 965 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
140 W
共同立场 Intel Celeron N3450 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
AMD Phenom II X4 965
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Intel Celeron J3000/N3000
Intel Celeron
8
Mobile
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
1.1 GHz
normal
4
4
没有
没有
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
12
12
9
200 MHz
Intel HD Graphics 500
700 MHz
3
8 GB
Q3/2016
96
14 nm
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
没有
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Celeron N3450 和 AMD Phenom II X4 965. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
没有
8 GB
2
DDR3-1866DDR4-2400
6
2.0
是
比较TDP的要求 AMD Phenom II X4 965 和 Intel Celeron N3450 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
6 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 AMD Phenom II X4 965 和 Intel Celeron N3450, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Braswell
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
2 MB
Q3/2016
BGA 1296
14 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT
根据几项基准测试的结果，你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 AMD Phenom II X4 965 和 Intel Celeron N3450.
比较合成测试值，选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
