Qual è la scelta migliore Intel Core i9-13900 o Intel Core i9-13900K? Quale processore è più veloce?
Abbiamo preparato un confronto per aiutarvi a scegliere il processore migliore. Confrontate le loro specifiche e i loro benchmark.
Intel Core i9-13900 has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz (5.60 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Rilasciato in Q1/2023.
Intel Core i9-13900K has a base frequency of 3.80 GHz. 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Rilasciato in Q4/2022.
Motivi da considerare Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Posizioni comuni Intel Core i9-13900 CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
Motivi da considerare Posizione nella classifica generale
(sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)
Posizioni comuni Intel Core i9-13900K CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
Intel Core i9-13900
Informazioni di base sui processori a confronto, serie, generazione e segmento di mercato.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La grafica interna non influisce sulle prestazioni della CPU, ma svolge il lavoro della scheda grafica in sua assenza o su dispositivi mobili.
Codec integrati utilizzati per codificare e decodificare i contenuti. Velocizza notevolmente le operazioni richieste.
Tipi, quantità di canali di RAM supportati da Intel Core i9-13900K e Intel Core i9-13900. A seconda delle schede madri, possono essere supportate frequenze di memoria più alte o più basse.
Confrontare i requisiti TDP di TDP Intel Core i9-13900 e Intel Core i9-13900K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architettura, interfacce, istruzioni aggiuntive supportate da Intel Core i9-13900 e Intel Core i9-13900K, tecnologie per macchine virtuali e tecnologia di processo.
Shared tests with results for both models: 4
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900 | Intel Core i9-13900K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 388.183102 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 511.547382 samples/min Submissions: 12 | +31.8 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 319.733075 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 483.50998 samples/min Submissions: 68 | +51.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 354.424627 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 480.196647 samples/min Submissions: 241 | +35.5 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 353.267411 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 506.012269 samples/min Submissions: 251 | +43.2 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6191 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 327 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 15181 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 828 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 40103 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2267 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | 9028.644277 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B760M-H2/M.2 Duration: 1107.586 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900 | 10112.654976 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760M GAMING X AX Duration: 98.886 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Sulla base dei risultati di diversi benchmark, è possibile stimare con maggiore precisione la differenza di prestazioni tra Intel Core i9-13900 e Intel Core i9-13900K.
Confrontate i valori dei test sintetici e scegliete il processore migliore!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.