Illustrazione della famiglia.
Qual è la scelta migliore Intel Processor N100 o Intel Core Ultra 9 285H? Quale processore è più veloce?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Processor N100 has a base frequency of 1.80 GHz. 4 / 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 6 W. Rilasciato in Q1/2023.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H has a base frequency of 2.9 GHz. 16 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. Rilasciato in Q1/2025.
Motivi da considerare Posizione nella classifica generale
(sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Posizioni comuni Intel Processor N100 CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.
Motivi da considerare Velocità di clock più alta
Intorno a 61% migliore velocità di clock
Più numero di core
12 more cores
Velocità di clock turbo più alta
Intorno a 59 % higher specified turbo frequency
Intel Processor N100
Informazioni di base sui processori a confronto, serie, generazione e segmento di mercato.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La grafica interna non influisce sulle prestazioni della CPU, ma svolge il lavoro della scheda grafica in sua assenza o su dispositivi mobili.
Codec integrati utilizzati per codificare e decodificare i contenuti. Velocizza notevolmente le operazioni richieste.
Tipi, quantità di canali di RAM supportati da Intel Core Ultra 9 285H e Intel Processor N100. A seconda delle schede madri, possono essere supportate frequenze di memoria più alte o più basse.
Confrontare i requisiti TDP di TDP Intel Processor N100 e Intel Core Ultra 9 285H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architettura, interfacce, istruzioni aggiuntive supportate da Intel Processor N100 e Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, tecnologie per macchine virtuali e tecnologia di processo.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 3937 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 489 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 1142 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 126 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 6410.87284 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 48 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 155.985 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 20681 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 2105 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 8068 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 809 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |