Ilustración de la familia.
Cuál es la mejor opción Intel Processor N100 o Intel Core Ultra 9 285H? ¿Qué procesador es más rápido?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Processor N100 has a base frequency of 1.80 GHz. 4 / 4 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 6 W. Publicado en Q1/2023.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H has a base frequency of 2.9 GHz. 16 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. Publicado en Q1/2025.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Posiciones comunes Intel Processor N100 CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Razones a tener en cuenta Mayor velocidad de reloj
En 61% mejor velocidad de reloj
Más número de núcleos
12 more cores
Mayor velocidad de reloj turbo
En 59 % higher specified turbo frequency
Intel Processor N100
Información sobre los procesadores que se comparan, serie, generación y segmento de mercado.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La gráfica interna no afecta al rendimiento de la CPU, realiza el trabajo de la tarjeta gráfica en su ausencia o en dispositivos móviles.
Códecs incorporados para codificar y descodificar contenidos. Acelera significativamente las operaciones necesarias.
Tipos, cantidad de canales de RAM soportados por Intel Core Ultra 9 285H y Intel Processor N100. Dependiendo de las placas base, pueden admitirse frecuencias de memoria más altas o más bajas.
Compara los requisitos del TDP Intel Processor N100 y Intel Core Ultra 9 285H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Arquitectura, interfaces, instrucciones adicionales soportadas por Intel Processor N100 y Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, tecnologías de máquinas virtuales y tecnología de procesos.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 3937 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 489 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 1142 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 126 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 6410.87284 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 48 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 155.985 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 20681 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 2105 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 8068 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 809 points | System: GMK EVO-T1 CPU / power label: Ultra 9 285H 80 W / 70 W Graphics: Arc 140T 2350 MHz RAM: 64 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position. |