Quel est le meilleur choix ? Intel Core i9-13900 ou Intel Core i9-13900K? Quel est le processeur le plus rapide ?
Nous avons préparé un comparatif pour vous aider à choisir le meilleur processeur. Comparez leurs spécifications et leurs benchmarks.
Intel Core i9-13900 has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz (5.60 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Sorti en Q1/2023.
Intel Core i9-13900K has a base frequency of 3.80 GHz. 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Sorti en Q4/2022.
Raisons de considérer Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Positions communes Intel Core i9-13900 CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Raisons de considérer Place dans le classement général
(sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)
Positions communes Intel Core i9-13900K CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Intel Core i9-13900
Informations générales sur les processeurs comparés, la série, la génération et le segment de marché.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics n'affecte pas les performances du CPU, il effectue le travail de la carte graphique en son absence ou sur les appareils mobiles.
Codecs intégrés utilisés pour coder et décoder le contenu. Accélère considérablement les opérations requises.
Types, canal quantité de RAM supportée par Intel Core i9-13900K et Intel Core i9-13900. Selon les cartes mères, des fréquences de mémoire supérieures ou inférieures peuvent être prises en charge.
Comparez les exigences du TDP Intel Core i9-13900 et Intel Core i9-13900K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, instructions supplémentaires supportées par Intel Core i9-13900 et Intel Core i9-13900K, les technologies des machines virtuelles et la technologie des processus.
Shared tests with results for both models: 4
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900 | Intel Core i9-13900K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 388.183102 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 511.547382 samples/min Submissions: 12 | +31.8 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 319.733075 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 483.50998 samples/min Submissions: 68 | +51.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 354.424627 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 480.196647 samples/min Submissions: 241 | +35.5 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 353.267411 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 506.012269 samples/min Submissions: 251 | +43.2 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6191 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 327 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 15181 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 828 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 40103 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2267 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | 9028.644277 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B760M-H2/M.2 Duration: 1107.586 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900 | 10112.654976 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760M GAMING X AX Duration: 98.886 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
En vous basant sur les résultats de plusieurs benchmarks, vous pouvez estimer avec plus de précision la différence de performance entre Intel Core i9-13900 et Intel Core i9-13900K.
Comparez les valeurs des tests synthétiques et choisissez le meilleur processeur !
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.