Jaki jest najlepszy wybór Intel Core i9-13900 lub Intel Core i9-13900K? Który procesor jest szybszy?
Przygotowaliśmy porównanie, które pomoże Ci wybrać najlepszy procesor. Porównaj ich specyfikacje i benchmarki.
Intel Core i9-13900 has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz (5.60 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Wydany w Q1/2023.
Intel Core i9-13900K has a base frequency of 3.80 GHz. 24 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Wydany w Q4/2022.
Powody do rozważenia Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Wspólne stanowiska Intel Core i9-13900 Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
Wspólne stanowiska Intel Core i9-13900K Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
Intel Core i9-13900
Informacje ogólne o porównywanych procesorach, serii, generacji i segmencie rynku.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics nie wpływa na wydajność procesora, wykonuje pracę karty graficznej w przypadku jej braku lub na urządzeniach mobilnych.
Wbudowane kodeki wykorzystywane do kodowania i dekodowania treści. Znacznie przyspiesza wymagane operacje.
Typy, kanały ilość pamięci RAM obsługiwanych przez Intel Core i9-13900K oraz Intel Core i9-13900. W zależności od płyt głównych mogą być obsługiwane wyższe lub niższe częstotliwości pamięci.
Porównaj wymagania TDP Intel Core i9-13900 oraz Intel Core i9-13900K Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architektura, interfejsy, dodatkowe instrukcje obsługiwane przez Intel Core i9-13900 oraz Intel Core i9-13900K, technologie maszyn wirtualnych i technologie procesowe.
Shared tests with results for both models: 4
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900 | Intel Core i9-13900K | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 388.183102 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 511.547382 samples/min Submissions: 12 | +31.8 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 319.733075 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 483.50998 samples/min Submissions: 68 | +51.2 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 354.424627 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 480.196647 samples/min Submissions: 241 | +35.5 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 353.267411 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 506.012269 samples/min Submissions: 251 | +43.2 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Published measurements are separate from the archived index. Incomplete conditions and unknown run counts do not support ranking positions or calculated performance differences.
| Model | Test | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / multi-core | 6191 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R15 / single-core | 327 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / multi-core | 15181 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R20 / single-core | 828 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / multi-core | 40103 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinebench R23 / single-core | 2267 points | Graphics card: GeForce RTX 3090 |
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900K | 9028.644277 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 10M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / B760M-H2/M.2 Duration: 1107.586 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900 | 10112.654976 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760M GAMING X AX Duration: 98.886 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Na podstawie wyników kilku benchmarków można dokładniej oszacować różnicę w wydajności między Intel Core i9-13900 oraz Intel Core i9-13900K.
Porównaj wartości testów syntetycznych i wybierz najlepszy procesor!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.