What's the best choice Matrox LUMA A310F or EVGA GeForce GT 1030 SC Low Profile? Which graphics card is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Matrox LUMA A310F has a base frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.
EVGA GeForce GT 1030 SC Low Profile has a base frequency of 1.290 GHz+ 5 %. Memory size 2 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q2/2017.
More memory
100% more memory
Common positions Matrox LUMA A310F GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
Common positions EVGA GeForce GT 1030 SC Low Profile GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F and EVGA GeForce GT 1030 SC Low Profile, chip, information processing units.
Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.
Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.
Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.
Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Matrox LUMA A310F and EVGA GeForce GT 1030 SC Low Profile.
Connectivity and connections.
Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.
Built-in support for video and image compression standards.
The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices
Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU EVGA GeForce GT 1030 SC Low Profile and Matrox LUMA A310F.
Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Matrox LUMA A310F and EVGA GeForce GT 1030 SC Low Profile.
Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Game frame rates
Archived results. The original measurement method and test conditions have not been verified.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.