Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Matrox LUMA A310F
ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D

Matrox LUMA A310F vs ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310F
Matrox LUMA A310F
Released
Q4/2021
Overall score
star star star star star
ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D
ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D

What's the best choice Matrox LUMA A310F or ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Matrox LUMA A310F has a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D has a maximum frequency of 1.626 GHz. Memory size 8 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q4/2021.

Differences

Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310F
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 19% better clock speed

    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.626 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310F GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2982 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1959 left arrow score
  • More memory

    50% more memory

    8 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    1610 place
  • Battlefield 5
    1554 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    1760 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    2158 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2247 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    1967 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    1696 place

Specifications

Technical data
Matrox LUMA A310F Matrox LUMA A310F
ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F and ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow AMD Radeon RX 6600
  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow Navi 23 XL
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 1792
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 64
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 112
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Speed
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 1.75 GHz
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 128 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F and ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.626 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.491 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow 2.044 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    50 W-33 % left arrow 132 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow 110 °C
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Matrox LUMA A310F and ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D.

  • Fan-Type
    Radial left arrow Axial
  • Fan 1
    1 x 70 mm left arrow 2 x 95 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    -- left arrow 1x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow 3x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    168 mm left arrow 269 mm
  • Height
    69 mm left arrow 132 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 41 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow 627 g
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D and Matrox LUMA A310F.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 8
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q4/2021
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 7 nm
  • Part-no
    LUMA-A310F left arrow RX6600 CLD 8G
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Matrox LUMA A310F and ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
7 fps (avg)
Matrox LUMA A310F
8.93
ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310F
34 fps (avg)
ASRock Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D
-->

Latest comparisons