Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Matrox LUMA A310
AMD Radeon Pro W7900

Matrox LUMA A310 vs AMD Radeon Pro W7900. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310
Matrox LUMA A310
Released
Q2/2023
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Radeon Pro W7900
AMD Radeon Pro W7900

What's the best choice Matrox LUMA A310 or AMD Radeon Pro W7900? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Matrox LUMA A310 has a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

AMD Radeon Pro W7900 has a maximum frequency of 1.855 GHz. Memory size 48 GB. Memory type GDDR6. Released in Q2/2023.

Differences

Videokards Reasons to consider
Matrox LUMA A310
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 7% better clock speed

    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.855 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Matrox LUMA A310 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2981 place
  • More memory

    92% more memory

    48 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Radeon Pro W7900 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Performance relative to other GPU chips
    15 place

Specifications

Technical data
Matrox LUMA A310 Matrox LUMA A310
AMD Radeon Pro W7900 AMD Radeon Pro W7900
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and AMD Radeon Pro W7900, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow AMD Radeon Pro W7900
  • GPU Chip
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow Navi 31 (RDNA 3.0)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    96 left arrow 96
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 6144
  • Render Output Units
    16 left arrow 192
  • Texture Units
    32 left arrow 384
  • Raytracing Cores
    6 left arrow 96
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 48 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 2.250 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 18 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    124 GB/s left arrow 864 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    64 bit left arrow 384 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 and AMD Radeon Pro W7900. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.855 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.495 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    30 W-60 % left arrow 295 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system Matrox LUMA A310 and AMD Radeon Pro W7900.

  • Fan-Type
    -- left arrow Radial
  • Fan 1
    -- left arrow 1 x 70 mm
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Cooler-Type
    Passive left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow 4x DP v2.1
  • DVI Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow Yes
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    168 mm left arrow 280 mm
  • Height
    69 mm left arrow 110 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 51 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU AMD Radeon Pro W7900 and Matrox LUMA A310.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q2/2023
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow 3,999 $
  • Structure size
    6 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Part-no
    LUMA-A310 left arrow --
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between Matrox LUMA A310 and AMD Radeon Pro W7900.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310
61.32
AMD Radeon Pro W7900
AMD Radeon Pro W7900 Performance relative to other GPU chips
77%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
84%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
100%
100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
122%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
-->

Latest comparisons