What's the best choice Intel Core i9-14900K or Intel Core i9-13900KS? Which processor is faster?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-14900K has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz. 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Released in Q4/2023.
Intel Core i9-13900KS has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz (6.00 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 150 W. Released in Q1/2023.
Reasons to consider Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
Common positions Intel Core i9-13900KS CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Intel Core i9-14900K
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i9-13900KS and Intel Core i9-14900K. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core i9-14900K and Intel Core i9-13900KS Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core i9-14900K and Intel Core i9-13900KS, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Shared tests with results for both models: 7
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-14900K | Intel Core i9-13900KS | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 536.5713 samples/min Submissions: 46 | 522.096617 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -2.7 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 503.755498 samples/min Submissions: 249 | 505.291001 samples/min Submissions: 11 | +0.3 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 511.944699 samples/min Submissions: 327 | 501.885652 samples/min Submissions: 13 | -2.0 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 497.466289 samples/min Submissions: 424 | 475.468961 samples/min Submissions: 11 | -4.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 477.890865 samples/min Submissions: 236 | 495.190602 samples/min Submissions: 19 | +3.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 497.628493 samples/min Submissions: 121 | 425.924975 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -14.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 519.675217 samples/min Submissions: 305 | 518.577746 samples/min Submissions: 19 | -0.2 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-14900K | 14832.393948 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX Duration: 67.42 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900KS | 4992.087541 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / Z690 Extreme Duration: 200.317 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |