최선의 선택은 무엇인가요? Intel Core i9-14900K 또는 Intel Core i9-13900KS? 哪种处理器更快?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-14900K has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz. 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. 에 출시 Q4/2023.
Intel Core i9-13900KS has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz (6.00 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 150 W. 에 출시 Q1/2023.
고려해야 하는 이유 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
공통 위치 Intel Core i9-13900KS 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
Intel Core i9-14900K
비교 대상 프로세서, 시리즈, 세대 및 시장 부문에 대한 배경 정보.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
내부 그래픽은 CPU의 성능에 영향을 미치지 않으며, 부재 시 또는 모바일 장치에서 그래픽 카드의 작업을 수행합니다.
콘텐츠 인코딩 및 디코딩에 사용되는 코덱이 내장되어 있습니다. 필요한 작업 속도를 크게 높입니다.
지원되는 RAM의 유형, 채널 수량 Intel Core i9-13900KS 그리고 Intel Core i9-14900K. 마더보드에 따라 더 높거나 낮은 메모리 주파수가 지원될 수 있습니다.
TDP 요구 사항 비교 Intel Core i9-14900K 그리고 Intel Core i9-13900KS Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
아키텍처, 인터페이스, 지원되는 추가 지침 Intel Core i9-14900K 그리고 Intel Core i9-13900KS, 가상 머신 기술 및 프로세스 기술.
Shared tests with results for both models: 7
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-14900K | Intel Core i9-13900KS | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 536.5713 samples/min Submissions: 46 | 522.096617 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -2.7 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 503.755498 samples/min Submissions: 249 | 505.291001 samples/min Submissions: 11 | +0.3 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 511.944699 samples/min Submissions: 327 | 501.885652 samples/min Submissions: 13 | -2.0 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 497.466289 samples/min Submissions: 424 | 475.468961 samples/min Submissions: 11 | -4.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 477.890865 samples/min Submissions: 236 | 495.190602 samples/min Submissions: 19 | +3.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 497.628493 samples/min Submissions: 121 | 425.924975 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -14.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 519.675217 samples/min Submissions: 305 | 518.577746 samples/min Submissions: 19 | -0.2 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-14900K | 14832.393948 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX Duration: 67.42 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900KS | 4992.087541 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / Z690 Extreme Duration: 200.317 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |