ベストな選択とは Intel Core i9-14900K または Intel Core i9-13900KS? どちらのプロセッサーが速いか?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-14900K has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz. 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. で発売されました。 Q4/2023.
Intel Core i9-13900KS has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz (6.00 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 150 W. で発売されました。 Q1/2023.
考慮すべき理由 Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
考慮すべき理由 総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
共通ポジション Intel Core i9-13900KS 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
Intel Core i9-14900K
比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。
コンテンツのエンコード、デコードに使用するコーデックを内蔵。必要な処理を大幅に高速化。
サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 Intel Core i9-13900KS と Intel Core i9-14900K. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。
TDPの要求事項を比較する Intel Core i9-14900K と Intel Core i9-13900KS Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 Intel Core i9-14900K と Intel Core i9-13900KS, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術
Shared tests with results for both models: 7
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-14900K | Intel Core i9-13900KS | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 536.5713 samples/min Submissions: 46 | 522.096617 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -2.7 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 503.755498 samples/min Submissions: 249 | 505.291001 samples/min Submissions: 11 | +0.3 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 511.944699 samples/min Submissions: 327 | 501.885652 samples/min Submissions: 13 | -2.0 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 497.466289 samples/min Submissions: 424 | 475.468961 samples/min Submissions: 11 | -4.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 477.890865 samples/min Submissions: 236 | 495.190602 samples/min Submissions: 19 | +3.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 497.628493 samples/min Submissions: 121 | 425.924975 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -14.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 519.675217 samples/min Submissions: 305 | 518.577746 samples/min Submissions: 19 | -0.2 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-14900K | 14832.393948 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX Duration: 67.42 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900KS | 4992.087541 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / Z690 Extreme Duration: 200.317 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |