Jaki jest najlepszy wybór Intel Core i9-14900K lub Intel Core i9-13900KS? Który procesor jest szybszy?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-14900K has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz. 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 125 W. Wydany w Q4/2023.
Intel Core i9-13900KS has a base frequency of 3.20 GHz (6.00 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 150 W. Wydany w Q1/2023.
Powody do rozważenia Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
Wspólne stanowiska Intel Core i9-13900KS Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
Intel Core i9-14900K
Informacje ogólne o porównywanych procesorach, serii, generacji i segmencie rynku.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics nie wpływa na wydajność procesora, wykonuje pracę karty graficznej w przypadku jej braku lub na urządzeniach mobilnych.
Wbudowane kodeki wykorzystywane do kodowania i dekodowania treści. Znacznie przyspiesza wymagane operacje.
Typy, kanały ilość pamięci RAM obsługiwanych przez Intel Core i9-13900KS oraz Intel Core i9-14900K. W zależności od płyt głównych mogą być obsługiwane wyższe lub niższe częstotliwości pamięci.
Porównaj wymagania TDP Intel Core i9-14900K oraz Intel Core i9-13900KS Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architektura, interfejsy, dodatkowe instrukcje obsługiwane przez Intel Core i9-14900K oraz Intel Core i9-13900KS, technologie maszyn wirtualnych i technologie procesowe.
Shared tests with results for both models: 7
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-14900K | Intel Core i9-13900KS | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 536.5713 samples/min Submissions: 46 | 522.096617 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -2.7 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 503.755498 samples/min Submissions: 249 | 505.291001 samples/min Submissions: 11 | +0.3 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 511.944699 samples/min Submissions: 327 | 501.885652 samples/min Submissions: 13 | -2.0 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 497.466289 samples/min Submissions: 424 | 475.468961 samples/min Submissions: 11 | -4.4 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 477.890865 samples/min Submissions: 236 | 495.190602 samples/min Submissions: 19 | +3.6 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 497.628493 samples/min Submissions: 121 | 425.924975 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -14.4 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 519.675217 samples/min Submissions: 305 | 518.577746 samples/min Submissions: 19 | -0.2 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-14900K | 14832.393948 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX Duration: 67.42 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900KS | 4992.087541 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / Z690 Extreme Duration: 200.317 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |