What's the best choice Intel Core i9-13900 or AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D? Which processor is faster?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-13900 has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz (5.60 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q1/2023.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D has a base frequency of 3.4 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 105 W. Released in 2022-04-20.
Reasons to consider More number of cores
16 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Common positions Intel Core i9-13900 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider
Intel Core i9-13900
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Intel Core i9-13900. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core i9-13900 and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core i9-13900 and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Shared tests with results for both models: 4
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900 | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 388.183102 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 222.029305 samples/min Submissions: 54 | -42.8 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 319.733075 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 208.927487 samples/min Submissions: 115 | -34.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 354.424627 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 199.315512 samples/min Submissions: 103 | -43.8 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 353.267411 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 204.632802 samples/min Submissions: 179 | -42.1 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 7597.91817 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 48 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME B450M-A II Duration: 131.615 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900 | 10112.654976 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760M GAMING X AX Duration: 98.886 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |