Cuál es la mejor opción Intel Core i9-13900 o AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D? ¿Qué procesador es más rápido?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core i9-13900 has a base frequency of 2.00 GHz (5.60 GHz). 24 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Publicado en Q1/2023.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D has a base frequency of 3.4 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 105 W. Publicado en 2022-04-20.
Razones a tener en cuenta Más número de núcleos
16 more cores
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
Posiciones comunes Intel Core i9-13900 CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Razones a tener en cuenta
Intel Core i9-13900
Información sobre los procesadores que se comparan, serie, generación y segmento de mercado.
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
La gráfica interna no afecta al rendimiento de la CPU, realiza el trabajo de la tarjeta gráfica en su ausencia o en dispositivos móviles.
Códecs incorporados para codificar y descodificar contenidos. Acelera significativamente las operaciones necesarias.
Tipos, cantidad de canales de RAM soportados por AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D y Intel Core i9-13900. Dependiendo de las placas base, pueden admitirse frecuencias de memoria más altas o más bajas.
Compara los requisitos del TDP Intel Core i9-13900 y AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
Arquitectura, interfaces, instrucciones adicionales soportadas por Intel Core i9-13900 y AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, tecnologías de máquinas virtuales y tecnología de procesos.
Shared tests with results for both models: 4
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900 | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 388.183102 samples/min Submissions: 8 | 222.029305 samples/min Submissions: 54 | -42.8 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 319.733075 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 208.927487 samples/min Submissions: 115 | -34.7 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 354.424627 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 199.315512 samples/min Submissions: 103 | -43.8 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 353.267411 samples/min Submissions: 19 | 204.632802 samples/min Submissions: 179 | -42.1 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 7597.91817 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / windows System RAM: 48 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / PRIME B450M-A II Duration: 131.615 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900 | 10112.654976 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.22.2 / 1M / 32 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. / B760M GAMING X AX Duration: 98.886 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |