HiSilicon Kirin 950
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2015
HiSilicon Kirin 950
HiSilicon Kirin 950
Released
Q4/2020
User rating
star star star star star
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690

What's the best choice HiSilicon Kirin 950 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 690? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

HiSilicon Kirin 950 has a base frequency of 1.80 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q4/2015.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 has a base frequency of 1.70 GHz. 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Released in Q4/2020.

Differences

  • Higher clock speed

    Around 6% better clock speed

    1.80 GHz left arrow 1.70 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 15% higher specified turbo frequency

    2.30 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions HiSilicon Kirin 950 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1137 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1006 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1447 place

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    860 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    796 place
  • AnTuTu 8 benchmark
    52 place

Specifications

Technical data
HiSilicon Kirin 950 HiSilicon Kirin 950
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • CPU group
    HiSilicon Kirin 950 left arrow Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
  • Family
    HiSilicon Kirin left arrow Qualcomm Snapdragon
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 8
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • A-Core
    4x Cortex-A72 left arrow 2x Kryo 560 Gold
  • B-Core
    4x Cortex-A53 left arrow 6x Kryo 560 Silver
  • Base Frequency
    1.8 GHz left arrow 1.7 GHz
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 8
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    2.3 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)
    2.3 GHz left arrow 1.7 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 12.1
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow 0
  • Generation
    Midgard 4 left arrow 6
  • GPU Frequency
    900 MHz left arrow 950 MHz
  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-T880 MP4 left arrow Qualcomm Adreno 619L
  • GPU Turbo
    900 MHz left arrow No turbo
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 0
  • Release date
    Q2/2016 left arrow Q4/2020
  • Shader
    64 left arrow 0
  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 8 nm
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • H.264 / AVC
    Conflicting source values: Decode / Encode | No left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 and HiSilicon Kirin 950. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • Memory type
    LPDDR4 left arrow LPDDR4X-1866
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 690, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Architecture
    Cortex-A72 / Cortex-A53 left arrow Kryo 560
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • Part Number
    - left arrow SM6350
  • Release date
    Q4/2015 left arrow Q4/2020
  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 8 nm
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 690.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

331.000000
HiSilicon Kirin 950
603.000000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

Higher values are better in this metric.

1183.000000
HiSilicon Kirin 950
1813.000000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690

Latest comparisons