What's the best choice Apple A16 Bionic or Intel Core i5-13400F? Which processor is faster?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Apple A16 Bionic has a base frequency of 3.46 GHz. 6 / 6 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 8.5 W. Released in Q3/2022.
Intel Core i5-13400F has a base frequency of 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz). 10 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Released in Q1/2023.
Reasons to consider Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
65 W
Common positions Apple A16 Bionic CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
place
More number of cores
4 more cores
6
Common positions Intel Core i5-13400F CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Apple A16 Bionic
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
Intel Core i 13000
Intel Core i5
13
Intel Core i5-12400
Desktop / Server
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
6x Raptor Cove
2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz)
4x Gracemont
2.50 GHz (3.30 GHz)
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
10
16
Yes
No
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
-
-
-
None
-
-
-
-
-
-
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i5-13400F and Apple A16 Bionic. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
Yes
128 GB
89.6 GB/s
2 (Dual Channel)
DDR5-4800
5.0 x 20
Yes
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Apple A16 Bionic and Intel Core i5-13400F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
100 °C
65 W
117 W
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Apple A16 Bionic and Intel Core i5-13400F, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
Alder Lake S Refresh
Monolithic
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
20 MB
20 MB
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Q1/2023
LGA 1700
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13400F | 5494.082873 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 14 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. / B760M GAMING PLUS WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D99) Duration: 182.014 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Apple A16 Bionic and Intel Core i5-13400F.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
