AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. Specifications, performance, tests

User rating
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2025
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Family illustration.

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Released
Q1/2025
User rating
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Family illustration.

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

What's the best choice AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 or AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385? Which processor is faster?

Compare the available specifications of these models.

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has a base frequency of 3 GHz. 16 / 32 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. Released in Q1 2025.

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. 8 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 55 W. Released in Q1 2025.

Differences

  • More number of cores

    8 more cores

    16 left arrow 8
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 2% higher specified turbo frequency

    5.1 GHz left arrow 5 GHz
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 20% better clock speed

    3.6 GHz left arrow 3 GHz

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Family
    Ryzen left arrow Ryzen PRO
  • Form Factor
    Laptops / Desktops left arrow Laptops / Desktops
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Series
    Ryzen AI Max 300 Series left arrow Ryzen AI Max PRO 300 Series
CPU Technical specs

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

  • Base Frequency
    3 GHz left arrow 3.6 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    16 left arrow 8
  • CPU Threads
    32 left arrow 16
  • Max. Boost Clock
    5.1 GHz left arrow 5 GHz
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU Frequency
    2900 MHz left arrow 2800 MHz
  • GPU name
    Radeon 8060S Graphics left arrow Radeon 8050S Graphics
  • Graphics Cores
    40 left arrow 32
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    256-bit LPDDR5x left arrow 256-bit LPDDR5x
  • PCIe
    PCIe 4.0 left arrow PCIe 4.0
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

  • Configurable TDP
    45-120 W left arrow 45-120 W
  • Default TDP
    55 W left arrow 55 W
  • Maximum Operating Temperature
    100 °C left arrow 100 °C
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Availability window (manufacturer)
    Q1 2025 left arrow Q1 2025
  • Codename
    Strix Halo left arrow Strix Halo
  • Date evidence scope
    Manufacturer-announced OEM/board availability window; exact first shipment is not established by this source. left arrow Manufacturer-announced OEM/board availability window; exact first shipment is not established by this source.
  • L2-Cache
    16 MB left arrow 8 MB
  • L3-Cache
    64 MB left arrow 32 MB
  • Release date
    Q1/2025 left arrow Q1/2025
  • Socket
    FP11 left arrow FP11
  • Technology
    TSMC 4nm FinFET left arrow TSMC 4nm FinFET

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs
Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 7582 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 464 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 1710 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 1860 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 116 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 115 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 1813 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 114 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU / integrated graphics

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 44735 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution: 1280x720
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 35314 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 2027 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 13988 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 796 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W
Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB
RAM: 128 GB
Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics / integrated graphics

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 30087 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution: 1920x1080
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Time Spy Graphics / integrated graphics

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 11164 points System: Acemagic M1A Pro+
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution: 2560x1440
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 10286 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution:
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

Model ResultReported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 10636 points System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000
Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S
Resolution:
Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

Latest comparisons