AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

차이점
사양 벤치마크 사용 후기

차이점

고려해야 하는 이유
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

버그 신고하기

더 많은 코어 수

8 more cores

16 8
더 빠른 터보 클럭 속도

주변 2% higher specified turbo frequency

5.1 GHz 5 GHz

고려해야 하는 이유
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

버그 신고하기

더 빠른 클럭 속도

주변 20% 더 나은 클럭 속도

3.6 GHz 3 GHz

사양

기술 데이터

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

CPU 제품군 및 그룹

비교 대상 프로세서, 시리즈, 세대 및 시장 부문에 대한 배경 정보.

가족

Ryzen Ryzen PRO
Form Factor

Laptops / Desktops Laptops / Desktops
세그먼트

Mobile Mobile
Series

Ryzen AI Max 300 Series Ryzen AI Max PRO 300 Series

CPU 기술 사양

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

Base Frequency

3 GHz 3.6 GHz
CPU 코어

16 8
CPU 스레드

32 16
Max. Boost Clock

5.1 GHz 5 GHz

IGPU

내부 그래픽은 CPU의 성능에 영향을 미치지 않으며, 부재 시 또는 모바일 장치에서 그래픽 카드의 작업을 수행합니다.

GPU Frequency

2900 MHz 2800 MHz
GPU 이름

Radeon 8060S Graphics Radeon 8050S Graphics
Graphics Cores

40 32

메모리 사양 및 PCI

지원되는 RAM의 유형, 채널 수량 AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 그리고 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395. 마더보드에 따라 더 높거나 낮은 메모리 주파수가 지원될 수 있습니다.

메모리 유형

256-bit LPDDR5x 256-bit LPDDR5x
PCIe

PCIe 4.0 PCIe 4.0

열 관리

TDP 요구 사항 비교 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 그리고 AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Configurable TDP

45-120 W 45-120 W
Default TDP

55 W 55 W
Maximum Operating Temperature

100 °C 100 °C

기술 및 확장 기능

아키텍처, 인터페이스, 지원되는 추가 지침 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 그리고 AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, 가상 머신 기술 및 프로세스 기술.

Availability window (manufacturer)

Q1 2025 Q1 2025
Codename

Strix Halo Strix Halo
Date evidence scope

Manufacturer-announced OEM/board availability window; exact first shipment is not established by this source. Manufacturer-announced OEM/board availability window; exact first shipment is not established by this source.
L2-Cache

16 MB 8 MB
L3-Cache

64 MB 32 MB
릴리스 날짜

Q1/2025 Q1/2025
소켓

FP11 FP11
기술

TSMC 4nm FinFET TSMC 4nm FinFET

벤치마크

성능 테스트 CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 447.642125 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 445.528248 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 548.440615 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 283.682631 samples/min

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	7582 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	464 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	1710 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	1860 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	116 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	115 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	1813 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	114 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	44735 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: 1280x720 Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	35314 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	2027 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	13988 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	796 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	30087 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: 1920x1080 Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Time Spy Graphics / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	11164 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: 2560x1440 Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	10286 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	10636 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.