AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

相違点
 仕様ベンチマークお客様の声

相違点

考慮すべき理由
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

バグを報告する

より多くのコア数

8 more cores

16 8
ターボクロックの高速化

周辺 2% higher specified turbo frequency

5.1 GHz 5 GHz

考慮すべき理由
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

バグを報告する

クロックの高速化

周辺 20% クロックスピードの向上

3.6 GHz 3 GHz

仕様

技術データ

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

CPUファミリー、グループ

比較するプロセッサの背景情報、シリーズ、世代、市場セグメント。

シリーズ

Ryzen Ryzen PRO
Form Factor

Laptops / Desktops Laptops / Desktops
セグメント

Mobile Mobile
Series

Ryzen AI Max 300 Series Ryzen AI Max PRO 300 Series

CPU 技術仕様

Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.

Base Frequency

3 GHz 3.6 GHz
CPUコア

16 8
CPUスレッド

32 16
Max. Boost Clock

5.1 GHz 5 GHz

IGPU

内蔵グラフィックスは、CPUの性能に影響を与えず、グラフィックスカードがない場合やモバイルデバイスでグラフィックスカードの仕事を実行します。

GPU Frequency

2900 MHz 2800 MHz
GPU名

Radeon 8060S Graphics Radeon 8050S Graphics
Graphics Cores

40 32

メモリスペック＆PCI

サポートするRAMの種類、チャンネル数 AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 と AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395. マザーボードによっては、より高いまたは低いメモリ周波数がサポートされる場合があります。

メモリータイプ

256-bit LPDDR5x 256-bit LPDDR5x
PCIe

PCIe 4.0 PCIe 4.0

エネルギー消費量

TDPの要求事項を比較する AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 と AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.

Configurable TDP

45-120 W 45-120 W
Default TDP

55 W 55 W
Maximum Operating Temperature

100 °C 100 °C

技術・拡張性

アーキテクチャ、インターフェース、サポートされる追加命令 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 と AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, 仮想マシン技術、プロセス技術

Availability window (manufacturer)

Q1 2025 Q1 2025
Codename

Strix Halo Strix Halo
Date evidence scope

Manufacturer-announced OEM/board availability window; exact first shipment is not established by this source. Manufacturer-announced OEM/board availability window; exact first shipment is not established by this source.
L2-Cache

16 MB 8 MB
L3-Cache

64 MB 32 MB
発売日

Q1/2025 Q1/2025
ソケット

FP11 FP11
ぎじゅつてきなかだい

TSMC 4nm FinFET TSMC 4nm FinFET

ベンチマーク

性能試験 CPUs

Individual model tests

These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Blender 5.1.0 / CPU / Windows 447.642125 samples/min
Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows 445.528248 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux 548.440615 samples/min
Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Windows 283.682631 samples/min

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Individual system tests

Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.

Cinebench 2026 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	7582 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2026 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	464 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	1710 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	1860 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	116 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	115 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 CPU / power label: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	1813 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench 2024 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	114 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	44735 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: 1280x720 Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	35314 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R23 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	2027 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / multiple threads

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	13988 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

Cinebench R20 / single thread

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	796 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ CPU / power label: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 140 W / 120 W Graphics: Radeon 8060S 8 GB RAM: 128 GB Exact test build and complete conditions are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	30087 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: 1920x1080 Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Time Spy Graphics / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	11164 points	System: Acemagic M1A Pro+ Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: 2560x1440 Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	10286 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – „Silent“ Max+ 395 (85W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light / integrated graphics

Model	Result	Reported conditions
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	10636 points	System: Beelink GTR9 Pro – Standard Max+ 395 (120W), LPDDR5X-8000 Graphics: AMD Radeon 8060S Resolution: Memory, power and exact benchmark build are unreported; no ranking position.