Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
AMD FX-8370
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 vs AMD FX-8370. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2016
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
Released
Q3/2014
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD FX-8370
AMD FX-8370

What's the best choice Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 or AMD FX-8370? Which processor is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 has a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz. 14 Cores. Power consumption of 135 W. Released in Q1/2016.

AMD FX-8370 has a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz. 8 Cores. Power consumption of 125 W. Released in Q3/2014.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    392 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    6 times more cores

    14 left arrow 8

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    473 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    119 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    786 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    177 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    151 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    40 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    92 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    47 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    235 place
AMD FX-8370 Reasons to consider
AMD FX-8370
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1006 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 35% better clock speed

    4.00 GHz left arrow 2.60 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 19 % better overclocked clock speed

    4.30 GHz left arrow 3.50 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.93 times less performance per watt

    125 W left arrow 135 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-8370 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    525 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    374 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    806 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    444 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1048 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    804 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    580 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    350 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    354 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    282 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    588 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
AMD FX-8370 AMD FX-8370
CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Xeon E5 left arrow AMD FX
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon E5 v4 left arrow AMD FX-8000
  • Predecessor
    Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 left arrow --
CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

  • Frequency
    2.60 GHz left arrow 4.00 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    14 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.50 GHz left arrow 4.30 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    28 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD FX-8370 and Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR3-1866
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow
  • PCIe lanes
    40 left arrow
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 and AMD FX-8370 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    135 W left arrow 125 W
Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L3-Cache
    35.00 MB left arrow 8.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Broadwell E left arrow Vishera (Bulldozer)
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 2011-3 left arrow AM3+
  • Release date
    Q1/2016 left arrow Q3/2014

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 and AMD FX-8370.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
146
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
98
AMD FX-8370
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
2223
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
673
AMD FX-8370
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
793
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
585
AMD FX-8370
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
10719
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
2836
AMD FX-8370
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
4124
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
2195
AMD FX-8370
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
55735
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
11300
AMD FX-8370
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
1.78
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
1.14
AMD FX-8370
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
27.38
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
7.02
AMD FX-8370
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
21165
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
9176
AMD FX-8370

Latest comparisons