产品系列示意图。 Credit: Intel Corporation.
产品系列示意图。
什么是最好的选择 Intel Core Ultra X9 388H 或 AMD Ryzen Z2 A? 哪种处理器更快？
Compare the available specifications of these models.
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H has a base frequency of 2.1 GHz. 16 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 25 W. 发布于 Q1/2026.
AMD Ryzen Z2 A has a base frequency of 2.8 GHz. 4 / 8 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 15 W.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
12 more cores
4
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 34% higher specified turbo frequency
3.8 GHz
共同立场 Intel Core Ultra X9 388H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
No data
需要考虑的原因 更高的时钟速度
左右 33% 更好的时钟速度
2.1 GHz
Lower stated TDP / base power
Power limits alone do not measure performance per watt.
25 W
共同立场 AMD Ryzen Z2 A 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
No data
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Ryzen
Mobile
Handheld
Ryzen Z2
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
4
8
-
-
-
3.8 GHz
-
-
2.8 GHz
内部图形不影响CPU的性能，在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
AMD Radeon Graphics
1800 MHz
8
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 AMD Ryzen Z2 A 和 Intel Core Ultra X9 388H. 根据主板的不同，可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
-
-
-
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core Ultra X9 388H 和 AMD Ryzen Z2 A Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
-
-
-
6-20 W
15 W
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core Ultra X9 388H 和 AMD Ryzen Z2 A, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
4 MB
https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/handhelds/ryzen-z-series/z2-series/z2-a.html
-
-
-
2026-09-30
2 MB
No comparable benchmark results are available yet. Specifications alone do not determine which model is faster.
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
