什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i9-13900H 或 Intel Core i7-12650H? 哪种处理器更快?
我们准备了一份比较,帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
Intel Core i9-13900H has a base frequency of 2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
Intel Core i7-12650H has a base frequency of 2.30 GHz. 10 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 Q1/2022.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
4 more cores
共同立场 Intel Core i9-13900H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 共同立场 Intel Core i7-12650H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i9-13900H
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i7-12650H 和 Intel Core i9-13900H. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i9-13900H 和 Intel Core i7-12650H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i9-13900H 和 Intel Core i7-12650H, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 6
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900H | Intel Core i7-12650H | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 183.738244 samples/min Submissions: 56 | 153.011754 samples/min Submissions: 28 | -16.7 % |
| Blender 4.4.0 / CPU / Windows | 196.311314 samples/min Submissions: 39 | 136.820121 samples/min Submissions: 19 | -30.3 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 206.012944 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 137.051635 samples/min Submissions: 16 | -33.5 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 151.490866 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 149.824643 samples/min Submissions: 36 | -1.1 % |
| Blender 4.1.0 / CPU / Windows | 201.364266 samples/min Submissions: 31 | 149.831587 samples/min Submissions: 17 | -25.6 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 212.627128 samples/min Submissions: 118 | 154.264949 samples/min Submissions: 40 | -27.4 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-12650H | 5799.051275 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 16 threads / linux System RAM: 16 GB OS: Linux x86_64 Duration: 172.442 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900H | 5067.113924 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 197.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果,你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i9-13900H 和 Intel Core i7-12650H.
比较合成测试值,选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.