什么是最好的选择 Intel Core i9-13900H 或 Intel Core i5-13500H? 哪种处理器更快?
我们准备了一份比较,帮助你选择最好的处理器。比较它们的规格和基准。
Intel Core i9-13900H has a base frequency of 2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz). 14 / 20 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
Intel Core i5-13500H has a base frequency of 2.60 GHz (4.70 GHz). 12 / 16 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 45 W. 发布于 Q1/2023.
需要考虑的原因 更多的核心数量
2 more cores
共同立场 Intel Core i9-13900H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
需要考虑的原因 共同立场 Intel Core i5-13500H 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.
Intel Core i9-13900H
有关被比较的处理器、系列、代数和细分市场的背景信息。
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
内部图形不影响CPU的性能,在没有显卡或在移动设备上执行显卡的工作。
用于编码和解码内容的内置编解码器。大大地加快了所需的操作。
支持的RAM的类型、通道数量 Intel Core i5-13500H 和 Intel Core i9-13900H. 根据主板的不同,可能支持更高或更低的内存频率。
比较TDP的要求 Intel Core i9-13900H 和 Intel Core i5-13500H Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
架构、接口、所支持的额外指令 Intel Core i9-13900H 和 Intel Core i5-13500H, 虚拟机技术和工艺技术。
Shared tests with results for both models: 4
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | Intel Core i9-13900H | Intel Core i5-13500H | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 183.738244 samples/min Submissions: 56 | 147.440563 samples/min Submissions: 7 | -19.8 % |
| Blender 4.3.0 / CPU / Windows | 206.012944 samples/min Submissions: 49 | 129.933436 samples/min Submissions: 10 | -36.9 % |
| Blender 4.2.0 / CPU / Windows | 151.490866 samples/min Submissions: 53 | 137.580254 samples/min Submissions: 8 | -9.2 % |
| Blender 4.0.0 / CPU / Windows | 212.627128 samples/min Submissions: 118 | 168.723788 samples/min Submissions: 14 | -20.6 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900H | 5067.113924 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 17 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Duration: 197.351 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-13500H | 4349.149741 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.24.0 / 1M / 13 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: HP / 8BB1 Duration: 229.93 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
根据几项基准测试的结果,你可以更准确地估计出以下两者的性能差异 Intel Core i9-13900H 和 Intel Core i5-13500H.
比较合成测试值,选择最好的处理器!
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Cinebench R23 · Cinebench R20 · Cinebench R15 · Cinebench 2026 · RandomX benchmark
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.